Internet access Arizonans take for granted at home isn’t available to students in many of the state’s public schools, leaving them lagging in skills they will need to compete in universities or thrive in the workforce.

Schools lack equipment, Internet connections and money to train teachers to create tech-savvy students. The state trails the national average for the amount of Internet access available to students. The fixes are not simple.

• Money: For years, the state has discussed and planned to advance computer learning. But it lacks the cash - or the resolve to spend it - to help all districts improve.
• Infrastructure: Internet access depends on connections to the cables and networks that carry information. In many parts of the state, those connections are inadequate for newer computers and Web technology. So even if districts have the computers, they don’t have the high-speed connections to make good use of them.
• Inequity: Affluent districts come up with funds from their voters to buy computers for teachers and students and to improve classroom training. Poorer districts and their students are left behind, widening the gap between those with computer skills and those without.

The stakes for computer learning are high.

Research shows students learn more quickly at lower cost if they shed textbooks in favor of Web-based courses.

But without solid, early training in computer use, experts say, Arizona’s students will fall further behind.

While Internet learning is important for students, on a larger scale, it’s just as critical for the entire economy, educators and business professionals say.

“You can’t compete without it,” said Rosalyn Boxer, an Arizona Department of Commerce projects manager. “A business can’t compete. A student can’t compete. Our workforce can’t compete.”

Haves and have-nots

Nearly a decade ago, the Paradise Valley Unified District in Phoenix established a technology teacher-training program, paid for with a special property tax. Today, every teacher has a laptop with high-speed Internet. The district has one computer, connected to high-speed Internet, for every two students.

Across town, in south Phoenix’s Murphy Elementary District, where property values are much lower, the school also has a special property tax. But it has to use all the revenue to maintain its buildings and buy furniture and school buses.

The district relies on federal grants to provide technology. Last school year, it reached a goal of one Internet-connected computer for every three students. Teachers were able to replace their Windows 98 machines with newer machines. Most student machines are still recycled or refurbished.

“They’re not the latest and greatest, and they have their difficulties,” Murphy’s information systems director, Jason Jordan, said of the district’s computer systems. “We worked hard. We tried.”

Now, the district is looking for money for the software and training to make use of those Internet connections.

Across Arizona, the disparities in digital education persist because of differences in funding.

For districts without extra tax revenue, options are limited. In 2006, Arizona’s schools requested $147.4 million from a federal grant program that reimburses schools for the cost of technology. The schools received $32 million. Grant requests since 2000 have yielded similar results.

The growing disparity is becoming a national debate, says Paul Koehler of WestEd, a research and policy organization. He expects the government or the courts to step in.

“It’s going to be a matter of equity,” Koehler said.

The state money

Arizona has considered, even established, a variety of technology-education plans, but nothing has survived.

The Arizona Department of Education created a plan in 2002 to fully integrate technology into K-12 curriculum by 2006. While the plan exists, the cash does not.

In 2005, state lawmakers considered spending $1.1 billion over four years to help schools shed textbooks in favor of high-speed online learning. It was considered too costly, and the bill didn’t pass.

The Legislature in recent years tried twice to fund a pilot project to turn some classrooms into models for electronic learning. The projects passed, but before programs began, lawmakers in later sessions yanked the money to plug other gaps in the budget.

The state agency charged with building new schools for growing districts funds one computer for every eight students, a 9-year-old standard.

Outside of that, the state has no dedicated money to bring technology into classrooms.

The conundrum of the funding crunch is that online learning can actually save schools money, partly by shedding textbooks. Much of the same information in a textbook is online.

But getting everyone online requires an upfront expense. Research shows it would take $50 million to $67 million to make sure every student and teacher in the state is connected to high-speed Internet, state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne said.

Ted Kraver is a systems engineer and entrepreneur who has spent the past decade advocating for more technology in Arizona schools. He is a member of the Arizona eLearning Task Force, a group of government, education and business leaders looking for ways to make it happen.

“Why didn’t we do something 10 years ago, five years ago, three years ago, one year ago beats the heck out of me,” Kraver said. “It’s the most obvious thing that we would invest a small amount of money to get our kids not just the hardware but all the software, all the visual curriculum and all the teacher development.”

The rural divide

Two years ago, schools in Superior Unified District were getting by with a weak Internet connection.

As in many rural districts, a teacher using an online video or a student downloading music brought the system to a standstill.

Everything changed when a global mining corporation proposed a controversial plan to dig for copper under the high desert town 50 miles southeast of Mesa.

A copper mine reopening in Superior would give this shrinking former mining town new jobs, new residents, new homes and new businesses. But today’s copper mining, with robots and computer-driven equipment, needs high-speed Internet connections and employees who can run electronic equipment.

The state’s Department of Commerce went about getting those needs met. It negotiated with utilities and telecommunications companies to build the connections.

Last year, the Internet connection to Superior was upgraded and with it the schools’ Internet service. Most rural districts aren’t so lucky.

In northeast Arizona’s Cedar Unified School District, the Internet connections are weak, spotty and prone to dropping.

The Hyder Elementary District in Dateland relied on federal grants to get an Internet link fast enough to run its office and have a few students in the library do research.

In Holbrook, “People ask: Why don’t you have this?,” says Ronald Neff, computer services director for Holbrook Unified. “Well, we don’t live in Maricopa County.”

Faster Internet connections are becoming more important. The size and content of Web pages have doubled in the past five years. Instructional videos and interactive Web sites require more bandwidth, the amount of data the connection can carry at any one time.

Most of Arizona’s high-bandwidth infrastructure runs along a corridor that serves Tucson, Phoenix and Flagstaff, and many city schools connect to it for a reasonable cost.

The infrastructure is owned and operated by an array of private companies.

Many schools are in communities too far away and too small to make it worthwhile for companies to create a connection. There just aren’t enough customers.

So, Internet is too expensive, too slow or not available at all.

It’s frustrating because people assume schools can simply put up an antenna and pick up high-speed Internet from the sky, said Chris Cummiskey, who heads Arizona’s Government Information Technology Agency.

“People think we’re much more connected in terms of the Internet highway than we are,” he said.

The students

In Mary Jane Torok’s classroom, the chalkboard is just extra space to hang posters and display student work. Chalk rarely touches the board.

Torok teaches eighth-grade social studies in Kyrene Elementary District, where she has worked for 22 years. Right now, Torok is teaching the Revolutionary War. Instead of using a chalkboard, Torok finds original documents online, such as soldiers’ letters, political cartoons, newspaper articles or photographs and projects them on a screen for her students to discuss.

If students want to add their thoughts to the presentation, Torok hands them her wireless keyboard.

When someone asks a relevant question, the student is sent to one of 10 computers in her room to find the answer on the Internet.

“The teachable moment is right there,” said Torok, who spends her summers taking district technology classes. “My resources are there for lesson planning, for sharing ideas and getting amazing curriculum.”

Her students still use a hardcopy textbook as a resource. The textbook is also available to them in an online version, which includes interactive maps of strategic battles and crossword puzzles with key vocabulary.

Torok customizes her student assignments, finding online reading material that challenges her quickest students and that makes the subject understandable for her slower ones.

At the end of the lesson plan, students will sum up what they have learned by presenting projects. They will create their own Web sites, videos, graphics or photo essays.

“For the kids, it’s their language,” Torok said. “They’re not dazzled by doing this. It’s just natural to them. They do amazing things.”

The National School Boards Association honored the district in 2006 for successfully integrating technology into the classroom.

The scene, of course, is not played out in many other Arizona classrooms.

This year, state education officials tested 40,000 fourth- and eighth-grade students on whether they met standards for understanding and using technology. Only half the eight-graders passed. In Grade 4, only 40 percent passed.

Unlike a growing number of states, Arizona can’t even administer the multiple-choice and writing sections of its standardized assessment test online. Too few schools have enough computers or computing power to administer the AIMS test to more than one or two classrooms at a time.

Arizona, with one high-speed connection per 4.3 students, also trails the national average of one connection per 3.7 students.

Right now, many Arizona students are not learning what they need to survive, thrive and create in the future economy.

“It’s never the technology that’s the impediment,” Cummiskey said. “It’s the resources, the policy issues and decisions that have to be made.”

Credits: AZCentral.com

Arizona State University has moved up three slots to No. 121 in a widely watched ranking of American colleges and is listed as an “up-and-coming school,” a new category that recognizes universities that have made striking improvements or innovations.

The annual rankings of 262 universities were released today by U.S. News & World Report. Harvard University is No. 1 again this year followed by Princeton and Yale universities. University of Arizona is ranked No. 96, the same as last year, while Northern Arizona University is an unranked school in the fourth tier.

A separate list that looks at only the top 50 public universities ranks UA at No. 45. ASU and NAU did not make that list.

U.S. News & World Report added an “up-and-coming schools” category where ASU is listed alongside schools such as George Mason and Clemson universities and the University of Southern California. Schools in this category are described as “not at the top of the rankings yet but tops for innovation.”

ASU President Michael Crow said rankings are a sensitive issue because they tend to favor elite institutions. Still, he is pleased where ASU ended up.

“We are where we would like to be,” he said.

The rankings judge schools on factors such as class size, student-faculty ratio, alumni contributions and the percentage of students who graduate. How a college is viewed by peer universities also plays a large role.

The rankings have come under fire from some university presidents, who feel the factors used to calculate them favor rich, private schools. For instance, schools can get more points toward their rankings by having tougher admission policies. Schools with more liberal admission policies get dinged.

Despite the criticism, universities that do well on the list often use the rankings in marketing efforts to attract top students and faculty. The annual report also ranks individual schools within universities such as law, engineering and business.

Credits: AZCentral.com

Tucson Losing Spring Training Teams? - Looks like the lack of funding and support from the city to the baseball presence has come full circle, because now the White Sox want to leave by the year’s end. Once they leave, it’s pretty clear that the Diamondbacks and Rockies will follow suit. It’s going to take money to keep them here by renovating the stadiums, and if Tucson doesn’t cater to this group and they leave, Tucson is going to lose money. It’s a Catch-22 right now for sure. My question is this: Isn’t spring training and everything about it something that keeps Tucson relevent? Why would the City of Tucson attend to this matter in such an incompetent manner? Who knows but hopefully they wisen up because spring training won’t wait like Rio Nuevo!

A Hearing on Tucson Unified School Districts Budget - With the price of utilities rising to new heights, the budget of TUSD can be changed soon enough. Not only is the tight budget having a principal oversee two schools in one case, but Qwest Communications is sueing the school district. Who sues a public school? I wonder what exactly happened for that to be, but it’s obvious that Qwest is a thorn in Tucson’s side.

The current issue of Newsweek magazine gives an A+ to Tucson’s BASIS Charter School—ranking it as the top public school in the United States based upon the Newsweek Challenge Index!

This index ranks public schools according to the number of college-level tests (like Advanced Placement) divided by the number of graduating seniors. We all know the importance of good, strong schools to a community – and this honor adds another dimension to the many reasons for buying a home in Tucson.
This is the third-straight year the magazine’s ranking has honored this Tucson charter school with a Top 10 spot. The BASIS school was created in 1998 by a University of Arizona economics professor with his wife, a former college professor in her native Czech Republic. Although only the high school is included in the Newsweek ranking, BASIS Tucson is a college preparatory charter school for grades 5-12. It offers a liberal arts curriculum with a focus on sciences and math. Students also participate in the arts. In fact, the school has received local recognition for its drama program. Also, one of its students recently completed his senior research project as an intern for US Senator Gabrielle Giffords.

The Tucson BASIS high school is located across from El Con Mall on East Broadway. This very modest facility has a treasure inside – a diversity of honors students with tremendous talents. Arizona long has been a leader in the charter school movement, and the BASIS charter school is one example of how a unique Tucson-based program is a model for education.

If you are considering a move to Tucson and looking for educational opportunities for your family, check out the Tucson BASIS Charter School.

A Tucson charter school in the Vail School District has won a national designation as a result of its recycling and conservation efforts!

All®, a leading American laundry detergent, recently recognized kids across America via its“Greenest School in America” contest – and Tucson’s own Civano Elementary School received the honor. The school’s impact on making a difference for the environment was featured on the Ellen DeGeneres television show earlier this year, and the award nets a $50,000 grant to be used for green improvements for this charter school in the Vail School District.

More than 3,000 schools from across the country participated in the contest. The K-5 Civano School entered the contest late last year, after a Civano parent heard about the program. The entire school community joined in to participate, with students submitting essays and eco-report cards. The school already focuses on environmental preservation through its water conservation program, its organic garden, its recycling efforts and its use of solar.

Civano is considering using the grant to complete the school kitchen and possibly build a community room, helping to increase awareness about environmental sustainability. This school is part of southeast Tucson’s award-winning community called Civano, which has its share of national designations. In 2004, Sunset magazine named the neighborhood “Best New Community of the Year,” and since then the community has achieved significant recognition for its various environmental programs. To learn more about Civano, visit the community website.

It’s all just another illustration by Ron Park of how Tucson is tops for quality of life!